That’s relative to your concerns. I could add a sixth.
Theres something to be said for ontological parsimony , and there’s something to be said for explanatory comprehensiveness. They are both values, so there is no completely objective resolution.
I could add that, even if you are not interested in social constructs, like money or morals, they are interested in you.
If you have a narrower definition of truth, you can do less with it.
I’m sure there is a sweet spot. Having 5 different definitions of reality is not it.
That’s relative to your concerns. I could add a sixth.
Theres something to be said for ontological parsimony , and there’s something to be said for explanatory comprehensiveness. They are both values, so there is no completely objective resolution.
I could add that, even if you are not interested in social constructs, like money or morals, they are interested in you.
OP is primarily describing different things that people mean by “existing”, not prescribing them.