The post talks about “selection processes” without saying what that term actually means. If you think for a moment about what that term means, the claim seems likely to either be wrong, or trivially true.
That is probably not what it means. There are various definitions of selection—e.g. see Hull 1988 for one example:
Selection: ‘a process in which the differential extinction and proliferation of interaction causes the differential perpetuation of the replicators that produced them’.
It’s a prediction—an empirical claim, not a definition.
The post talks about “selection processes” without saying what that term actually means. If you think for a moment about what that term means, the claim seems likely to either be wrong, or trivially true.
I took “selection processes” to mean “natural selection”.
That is probably not what it means. There are various definitions of selection—e.g. see Hull 1988 for one example:
Selection: ‘a process in which the differential extinction and proliferation of interaction causes the differential perpetuation of the replicators that produced them’.