Yes, good point. I retract the original claim.
As an aside, the permutations that we’re dealing with here are equal to their own inverse, so it’s not useful to apply them multiple times.
(You’re right, what you do here is you search for the kth permutation satisfying the theorem’s requirements, where k is the specified number.)
Yes, good point. I retract the original claim.
(You’re right, what you do here is you search for the kth permutation satisfying the theorem’s requirements, where k is the specified number.)