(Note: this reply is not aimed at XiXiDu in particular.)
I agree with Normal_Anomaly’s sibling comment. If the Bringsjords are saying that “S is for these reasons probably false, so belief in S can only be fideistic”, then they should just give arguments against S.
But the fact hinted here that humans haven’t gotten to human level AI yet
a sharp toddler of today makes a mockery of any computing machine with designs on natural-language communication
does appear to be evidence that human-level intelligences are not good at AI theory, thus not good at fooming quickly.
(Note: this reply is not aimed at XiXiDu in particular.)
I agree with Normal_Anomaly’s sibling comment. If the Bringsjords are saying that “S is for these reasons probably false, so belief in S can only be fideistic”, then they should just give arguments against S.
But the fact hinted here that humans haven’t gotten to human level AI yet
does appear to be evidence that human-level intelligences are not good at AI theory, thus not good at fooming quickly.