If someone has a good grasp of Bayes, it’s not that informative. (Though I liked the original idea and the story. :)) But, if one doesn’t already understand the math behind this, then it’s just a bunch of magic numbers, I am afraid. The second half of it for sure.
The intended audience for the second half is me ten years ago—someone who has never heard of the concepts, but would find them intriguing enough to unpack the math and follow the links. For the rest, I thought the novel angle on familiar philosophy might be fun.
Who is the intended audience for this?
If someone has a good grasp of Bayes, it’s not that informative. (Though I liked the original idea and the story. :)) But, if one doesn’t already understand the math behind this, then it’s just a bunch of magic numbers, I am afraid. The second half of it for sure.
The intended audience for the second half is me ten years ago—someone who has never heard of the concepts, but would find them intriguing enough to unpack the math and follow the links. For the rest, I thought the novel angle on familiar philosophy might be fun.