In 2018, I was listening to the change in US Nuclear Posture—saying that US could retaliate nuclear on a cyber attack. At that time I thought that kind of counter-threat is way out of line—“disproportional”—A cyberwar via hacking would be an inconvenience—rebooting a few machines and being prepared to replace some harddrives. But now I understand better. I believe the security establishment knew much more about our vulnerabilities than what they were sharing with us. Why were they quiet?
4 years later—do they have a plan? Is nuclear deterrence the only tool that is keeping us safe? Leadership looks different to me.
Well, we should start now …
In 2018, I was listening to the change in US Nuclear Posture—saying that US could retaliate nuclear on a cyber attack. At that time I thought that kind of counter-threat is way out of line—“disproportional”—A cyberwar via hacking would be an inconvenience—rebooting a few machines and being prepared to replace some harddrives. But now I understand better. I believe the security establishment knew much more about our vulnerabilities than what they were sharing with us. Why were they quiet?
4 years later—do they have a plan? Is nuclear deterrence the only tool that is keeping us safe? Leadership looks different to me.
I just read on BBC news: $10.5 Trillion annual damage by 2025 from cyber-crime.
Yes, we must have a technical solution for Hacker-AI asap.