Well, the idea behind “perfect celestial beings” kind of is to ignore physical constraints.
“I think the bottom line is that ‘unbounded’, instead of ‘really frickin large’, is a tough bar to pass and it should not carelessly be assumed in hypotheticals”—Why? I haven’t actually claimed the the non-existence of perfect rationality within the hypothetical leads to any real world consequences as of yet. Arguing against an argument I haven’t made does nothing.
Well, the idea behind “perfect celestial beings” kind of is to ignore physical constraints.
“I think the bottom line is that ‘unbounded’, instead of ‘really frickin large’, is a tough bar to pass and it should not carelessly be assumed in hypotheticals”—Why? I haven’t actually claimed the the non-existence of perfect rationality within the hypothetical leads to any real world consequences as of yet. Arguing against an argument I haven’t made does nothing.