Also, it is interesting to consider whether there are deep reasons that coherent belief seems to be anti-correlated with coherent morals.
I believe a major part of reason concentrates on “seems”; perhaps many people are [implicitly] [almost] rational (or not faced with practical problems challenging one’s thinking very often), but don’t give the vibe of having very coherent beliefs.
n=1. Once, I retold a few articles of Sequences (epistemic part) to my friend, who answered like “well, I have not read anything like that, but it maps to my understanding in finding out what happens around”. And indeed, there seemed to be null difference between him and the techniques. I did not try testing for differences, as it would be too time-consuming and generally not to the best for me.
I believe a major part of reason concentrates on “seems”; perhaps many people are [implicitly] [almost] rational (or not faced with practical problems challenging one’s thinking very often), but don’t give the vibe of having very coherent beliefs.
n=1. Once, I retold a few articles of Sequences (epistemic part) to my friend, who answered like “well, I have not read anything like that, but it maps to my understanding in finding out what happens around”. And indeed, there seemed to be null difference between him and the techniques. I did not try testing for differences, as it would be too time-consuming and generally not to the best for me.