Sorry for not responding to this sooner. Thank you for explaining your view. I have only two statements to make.
Apologies for failing to abide by the relevant norms of conversation. (This is not sarcasm. Without body language, it is hard to demonstrate this. However, perhaps I can express myself better with this photograph of a chimpanzee.)
If I were to anthropomorphize, the chimp would be thinking the chimp equivalent of “D’oh.”
After the recent romance thread (which was not qualitatively worse than the previous threads), stating that Lesswrong has a “Not-Getting-It-ness” with regards to gender is perhaps something of an understatement.
Sorry for not responding to this sooner. Thank you for explaining your view. I have only two statements to make.
Apologies for failing to abide by the relevant norms of conversation. (This is not sarcasm. Without body language, it is hard to demonstrate this. However, perhaps I can express myself better with this photograph of a chimpanzee.)
http://www.ebookanoid.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/embarrassed-chimp.jpg
If I were to anthropomorphize, the chimp would be thinking the chimp equivalent of “D’oh.”
After the recent romance thread (which was not qualitatively worse than the previous threads), stating that Lesswrong has a “Not-Getting-It-ness” with regards to gender is perhaps something of an understatement.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/08/27/science/chimp.reach533.jpg
If I were to anthropomorphize this chimp, the chimp would be thinking the chimp equivalent of “Really, folks? Really?”