I understand your desire to stick to an exegesis of your own essay, but part of a critical examination of your essay is seeing whether or not it is on point, so these sorts of questions really are “about” your essay.
Regardng your preliminary answer, I by “correct” I assume you mean “correctly reflecting the desires of the human supervisors”? (In which case, this discussion feeds into our other thread.)
With the best will in the world, I have to focus on one topic at a time: I do not have the bandwidth to wander across the whole of this enormous landscape.
As your question: I was using “correct” as a verb, and the meaning was “self-correct” in the sense of bringing back to the previosuly specified course.
In this case this would be about the AI perceiving some aspects of its design that it noticed might cause it to depart from what it’s goal was nominally supposed to be. In that case it would suggest modifications to correct the problem.
I understand your desire to stick to an exegesis of your own essay, but part of a critical examination of your essay is seeing whether or not it is on point, so these sorts of questions really are “about” your essay.
Regardng your preliminary answer, I by “correct” I assume you mean “correctly reflecting the desires of the human supervisors”? (In which case, this discussion feeds into our other thread.)
With the best will in the world, I have to focus on one topic at a time: I do not have the bandwidth to wander across the whole of this enormous landscape.
As your question: I was using “correct” as a verb, and the meaning was “self-correct” in the sense of bringing back to the previosuly specified course.
In this case this would be about the AI perceiving some aspects of its design that it noticed might cause it to depart from what it’s goal was nominally supposed to be. In that case it would suggest modifications to correct the problem.