Sorry, I may have been confused about what you were trying to say because you were responding to someone else, and I hadn’t come across the ‘steelman’ term before.
I withdraw ‘parody’ (sorry!) but … it isn’t quite what the logical structure of the paper was supposed to be.
It feels like you steelmanned it onto some other railroad track, so to speak.
Since it is a steelman it isnt supposed to be what the paper is saying,
Are you maintaining, in contrast, that the maverick nanny is flatly impossible?
Sorry, I may have been confused about what you were trying to say because you were responding to someone else, and I hadn’t come across the ‘steelman’ term before.
I withdraw ‘parody’ (sorry!) but … it isn’t quite what the logical structure of the paper was supposed to be.
It feels like you steelmanned it onto some other railroad track, so to speak.