Using more ordinary language, a Kantian might have preferences about the outcomes of his actions, but doesn’t think such preferences are the primary concern in what one ought to do.
Oh. Well, that’s not a distinction that seems terribly important to me. I’m happy to talk about “preferences” as being (necessarily) causally related to one’s actions.
Oh. Well, that’s not a distinction that seems terribly important to me. I’m happy to talk about “preferences” as being (necessarily) causally related to one’s actions.