Specific things—especially people—feel more real than abstract threats?
Also, maybe instead of actual damage the intuitions reflect the perceived intention / integrity of the actor? Like, it is more plausible that there is a honest misunderstanding / difference of opinions on AI safety, than about protecting a corrupt mayor. Such intuition may make sense in general (even if not specifically in the case of AI safety), because misunderstandings can possibly be addressed by a dialog, but it doesn’t make much sense to talk to people participating in corruption—they are perfectly aware of what they are doing.
Specific things—especially people—feel more real than abstract threats?
Also, maybe instead of actual damage the intuitions reflect the perceived intention / integrity of the actor? Like, it is more plausible that there is a honest misunderstanding / difference of opinions on AI safety, than about protecting a corrupt mayor. Such intuition may make sense in general (even if not specifically in the case of AI safety), because misunderstandings can possibly be addressed by a dialog, but it doesn’t make much sense to talk to people participating in corruption—they are perfectly aware of what they are doing.