I think you should post this as its own thread in Discussion.
If that sounds good, please, it’d be great if you could do it. I don’t have the status.
The link for the dwarf galaxy article use wrong, it should be:
http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/7528/20140611/galaxy-formation-theories-undermined-dwarf-galaxies.htm
Thanks.
Did somebody karma bomb your account? It looks like an awful lot of your posts have a single down-vote on them.
I assign a low probability to that. The user in question has just made a number of comments which are of low quality.
I’ve posted it here.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I think you should post this as its own thread in Discussion.
If that sounds good, please, it’d be great if you could do it. I don’t have the status.
The link for the dwarf galaxy article use wrong, it should be:
http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/7528/20140611/galaxy-formation-theories-undermined-dwarf-galaxies.htm
Thanks.
Did somebody karma bomb your account? It looks like an awful lot of your posts have a single down-vote on them.
I assign a low probability to that. The user in question has just made a number of comments which are of low quality.
I’ve posted it here.