We have imperfect information about everything. But each of us has different information, giving different probability distributions. Leaving aside the hidden-variable/EPR issues, why should we not regard these distributions as expressions of our variously imperfect knowledge, rather that a nondeterminacy present in the things themselves?
We always have Knightian uncertainty, lack of complete information, imperfect maps. The claim that there is also indeterminism in the territory as well is supported by arguments about EPR, hidden variables etc.
I was going to phrase my comment slightly differently but I think to make a similar point: all this post does is claim that we have subjective uncertainty about the past just as we do about the future, not that we need make any claims about determinism.
We have imperfect information about everything. But each of us has different information, giving different probability distributions. Leaving aside the hidden-variable/EPR issues, why should we not regard these distributions as expressions of our variously imperfect knowledge, rather that a nondeterminacy present in the things themselves?
We always have Knightian uncertainty, lack of complete information, imperfect maps. The claim that there is also indeterminism in the territory as well is supported by arguments about EPR, hidden variables etc.
I was going to phrase my comment slightly differently but I think to make a similar point: all this post does is claim that we have subjective uncertainty about the past just as we do about the future, not that we need make any claims about determinism.