No. In one of the posts or papers, I know I saw some comments or discussion that it is deceivable (and so you wouldn’t necessarily want to explain the procedure) but the obvious way doesn’t work.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
No. In one of the posts or papers, I know I saw some comments or discussion that it is deceivable (and so you wouldn’t necessarily want to explain the procedure) but the obvious way doesn’t work.