I think that there is quite a lot that is implicit if you are reading this from an open rather than defensive perspective.
One thing that I have noticed—as a general rule—is that, in any debate, no two debaters will ever agree on what is implicit in any argument. Anything that needs to be said, that forms an important part of the desired point, pretty much has to be stated explicitly, or most of the readers will fail to notice it.
Or, to put it another way; I, too, agree that your post would be much improved if you were a lot more explicit about precisely what you meant.
Voted up for “One thing that I have noticed—as a general rule—is that, in any debate, no two debaters will ever agree on what is implicit in any argument.”.
One thing that I have noticed—as a general rule—is that, in any debate, no two debaters will ever agree on what is implicit in any argument. Anything that needs to be said, that forms an important part of the desired point, pretty much has to be stated explicitly, or most of the readers will fail to notice it.
Or, to put it another way; I, too, agree that your post would be much improved if you were a lot more explicit about precisely what you meant.
Voted up for “One thing that I have noticed—as a general rule—is that, in any debate, no two debaters will ever agree on what is implicit in any argument.”.