I don’t consider the common set of predictions to have a conceptially useful complexity in the same sense that the algorithms do.
Why? Both are bit strings, no?
My computer represents numbers and letters as bit strings. This doesn’t mean it makes sense to multiply letters together.
This is related to a point that I attempted to make previously. You can measure complexity, but you must pick the context appropriately.
Why? Both are bit strings, no?
My computer represents numbers and letters as bit strings. This doesn’t mean it makes sense to multiply letters together.
This is related to a point that I attempted to make previously. You can measure complexity, but you must pick the context appropriately.