Hey, moderator here. The reason for banning your previous account was mostly just that we get a lot of quantum-theory crackpots, and your post had a lot of markings of someone in that reference class. The posts you wrote on this account seem a bit better, though the use of multiple punctuation marks in a row, and a somewhat unclear structure still make me hesitant. I will approve one of your two posts for now, and we will see how it goes.
Sorry for putting you under this additional scrutiny, but we get enough people who are really confused about various aspects of quantum mechanics and want to tell anyone about their opinions that we need to have somewhat high barriers for entry in that domain.
Hey, moderator here. The reason for banning your previous account was mostly just that we get a lot of quantum-theory crackpots, and your post had a lot of markings of someone in that reference class. The posts you wrote on this account seem a bit better, though the use of multiple punctuation marks in a row, and a somewhat unclear structure still make me hesitant. I will approve one of your two posts for now, and we will see how it goes.
Sorry for putting you under this additional scrutiny, but we get enough people who are really confused about various aspects of quantum mechanics and want to tell anyone about their opinions that we need to have somewhat high barriers for entry in that domain.
Sure, it is fine!! I imagine that is a high problem. As a physicist, although not someone in quantum mechanics, I tried to be precise.
Anyway, your answer has been good. It seems as the paper has been debunked.