Well, it shouldn’t have to do with expectations. Suppose you’re a normal person taking those sample questions—shouldn’t you expect ‘trick questions’ of some sort? (If I were taking a math test and was asked what is 50+50, I’d double-check several times...)
So they should have no disadvantage compared to the philosophers; I think this really is just a case of philosophers being more used to carefully checking through the language of the question, its presuppositions etc. and their own solution, and being better at it. Which should come as no surprise, since this is basically most of philosophy (as an activity)!
Well, it shouldn’t have to do with expectations. Suppose you’re a normal person taking those sample questions—shouldn’t you expect ‘trick questions’ of some sort? (If I were taking a math test and was asked what is 50+50, I’d double-check several times...)
So they should have no disadvantage compared to the philosophers; I think this really is just a case of philosophers being more used to carefully checking through the language of the question, its presuppositions etc. and their own solution, and being better at it. Which should come as no surprise, since this is basically most of philosophy (as an activity)!