I believe you, but why do you only want to explain the exact stems in private messages? Are you uncomfortable giving away your work for free, or afraid that some of the methods will be ridiculed?
Because it’s an individualized approach that is a WIP and if I just write it down 99% of people will execute it badly.
If someone is smart enough to do this in a solo fashion they can literally google search for various techs used in various diseases, figure out what’s easy and would fit a healthy person, then do it.
I posted a broad overview of what I did, I can’t actually get it into a format where I could instruct someone to replicate everything well, that’s practically my point… if this was pill-level difficulty I’d be on shelves by now, but it’s not, it’s easy but easy at a level that’s hard to reach in current social structures.
I’m perfectly fine giving this away for free, I am doing so as we speak with some people in SF :)
At this point though, I’m more interested in the trade-offs than in increasing my IQ. Education has made me more robotic, and it has made me think before I act (which does make me smarter), but this has made it harder to enjoy the moment and to “let go” and be myself.
Agree, social conditioning and amphetamins are a bad approach to increasing IQ.
Edit: Judging by the raw data, it seems like like your verbal IQ decreased? It’s really important. I should know since my spatial IQ is about 50 points above my verbal IQ.
See note, I got interrupted during a time sensitive task and didn’t care about it ⇒ so I moved forward, otherwise I’d have had to retake non-verbal components that I did care about.
I’m not a native speaker anyway (learned English in my teens), so the verabl IQ standalone is fairly meaningless.
Even if you make a perfect recipe, I don’t think it will be on the shelves ever. The brain changes in response to effort, and generally only when it believes that you’re doing something relevant/important. People who are looking for an easy way to super-intelligence might be the types who try to get around effort rather than welcome it. And I guess that the random participants in scientific studies might be too average as well, that they don’t try hard enough to get the desired effects.
I hope your experiments go well! It will be interesting to see what the ceiling is on the long-term results (and how many effects you can stack)
Because it’s an individualized approach that is a WIP and if I just write it down 99% of people will execute it badly.
If someone is smart enough to do this in a solo fashion they can literally google search for various techs used in various diseases, figure out what’s easy and would fit a healthy person, then do it.
I posted a broad overview of what I did, I can’t actually get it into a format where I could instruct someone to replicate everything well, that’s practically my point… if this was pill-level difficulty I’d be on shelves by now, but it’s not, it’s easy but easy at a level that’s hard to reach in current social structures.
I’m perfectly fine giving this away for free, I am doing so as we speak with some people in SF :)
Agree, social conditioning and amphetamins are a bad approach to increasing IQ.
See note, I got interrupted during a time sensitive task and didn’t care about it ⇒ so I moved forward, otherwise I’d have had to retake non-verbal components that I did care about.
I’m not a native speaker anyway (learned English in my teens), so the verabl IQ standalone is fairly meaningless.
I see! Thanks for your reply.
Even if you make a perfect recipe, I don’t think it will be on the shelves ever. The brain changes in response to effort, and generally only when it believes that you’re doing something relevant/important. People who are looking for an easy way to super-intelligence might be the types who try to get around effort rather than welcome it. And I guess that the random participants in scientific studies might be too average as well, that they don’t try hard enough to get the desired effects.
I hope your experiments go well! It will be interesting to see what the ceiling is on the long-term results (and how many effects you can stack)