Shouldn’t the follow up to no evidence showing that it does any good be “Is there any evidence showing it does harm?”
Have you seen this before? Any thoughts on how it might inform on your examples?
I am not defending the arrogance of some doctors but I do wonder if you are truly giving the doctor in question here a full opportunity and might have biased the discussion by stating things in a way that did not allow a good discussion to ensue but perhaps setup a more adversarial framework.
I wonder how much a believe in the Hippocratic Oath might be at play here.
Shouldn’t the follow up to no evidence showing that it does any good be “Is there any evidence showing it does harm?”
Have you seen this before? Any thoughts on how it might inform on your examples?
I am not defending the arrogance of some doctors but I do wonder if you are truly giving the doctor in question here a full opportunity and might have biased the discussion by stating things in a way that did not allow a good discussion to ensue but perhaps setup a more adversarial framework.
I wonder how much a believe in the Hippocratic Oath might be at play here.