It’s bad that trolley problems have weaknesses: sure, but you didn’t propose an alternative way of forcing people to reason about thorny moral problems. Criticizing trolley problems without proposing an alternative is like criticizing liberal democracy without proposing an alternative—easy, valid, and pointless.
With that comment, I have to ask about what you thought about the Less Wrong post about how critic’s do matter, even when they don’t always have alternatives.
You mean you missed it?