I should add to this that even if I endorse what you call “prejudice against prejudice” here—that is, even if I agree with current moral fashion that racism and sexism are not as good as their absence—it doesn’t follow that because racists or sexists can use a particular argument A as a line of defense, there’s therefore something wrong with A.
There are all sorts of positions which I endorse and which racists and sexists (and Babyeaters and Nazis and Sith Lords and...) might also endorse.
I should add to this that even if I endorse what you call “prejudice against prejudice” here—that is, even if I agree with current moral fashion that racism and sexism are not as good as their absence—it doesn’t follow that because racists or sexists can use a particular argument A as a line of defense, there’s therefore something wrong with A.
There are all sorts of positions which I endorse and which racists and sexists (and Babyeaters and Nazis and Sith Lords and...) might also endorse.