Edit: as discussed below, this is an incorrect interpretation of her comments
Wasn’t she saying that the child-rearing practices were a net good?
She talked about preparing men to be the solitary guardian with the rifle and women to take the lifeboat seat at the cost of her beloved’s life. I thought she was saying the sex-based child-rearing techniques (like being more attentive to female than male crying) advanced that goal.
From my point of view, no child-rearing advice should suggest treating babies less than a year old differently based on the sex of the child, UNLESS the advice is about diapering.
Wasn’t she saying that the child-rearing practices were a net good?
No. She said it was what we used to need. Her entire video is about how little we value male life and we indoctrinate males to sacrifice themselves for others.
9:00 to 11:50 - She’s saying the child-rearing techniques she describes lead to the “disposable man” attitudes in men and women.
11:50 to 13:10 - Attack on “dismantlers of gender roles” Set-aside programs, women-first policy, etc. reinforce “disposable man.”
13:10 to − 14:00 And women-firsters get what they ask for. Feminist ONLY exploits the disposable man dynamic. Feminism = enforced chivalry.
14:00 − 15:00 Society succeeded because women were put first. And we don’t need that dynamic any more. Call to action What’s the worst that would happen if women no more valuable than men, and men no more valuable than women. If we keep following feminism, society will end by unbalancing.
15:00 - end We should celebrate manhood, and feminists don’t want to. Instead, men come in “dead last, every time”
You are correct, in that I misread her call to action. Mostly because I was mindkilled about her definition of feminist. I’m not saying that no one acts how she describes from 11:50 − 14:00, but it’s just not an inherent property of feminist to act and believe that way.
For example, I don’t want to ignore male victim’s of domestic violence, and I doubt most other feminists want to either. I like her call to action, but I think it is a feminist call, and I think her factual assertions from 14:00 to the end (especially “men come in dead last, every time”) are almost entirely false.
Edit: as discussed below, this is an incorrect interpretation of her comments
Wasn’t she saying that the child-rearing practices were a net good?
She talked about preparing men to be the solitary guardian with the rifle and women to take the lifeboat seat at the cost of her beloved’s life. I thought she was saying the sex-based child-rearing techniques (like being more attentive to female than male crying) advanced that goal.
From my point of view, no child-rearing advice should suggest treating babies less than a year old differently based on the sex of the child, UNLESS the advice is about diapering.
No. She said it was what we used to need. Her entire video is about how little we value male life and we indoctrinate males to sacrifice themselves for others.
Edit: Yeah, this is all wrong. See my discussion below.
She NEVER said we should stop that kind of indoctrination. She barely acknowledged it was indoctrination.
I think you need to re-watch the video. It is not explicitly stated, yet it is very hard to miss.
I looked again.
9:00 to 11:50 - She’s saying the child-rearing techniques she describes lead to the “disposable man” attitudes in men and women.
11:50 to 13:10 - Attack on “dismantlers of gender roles” Set-aside programs, women-first policy, etc. reinforce “disposable man.”
13:10 to − 14:00 And women-firsters get what they ask for. Feminist ONLY exploits the disposable man dynamic. Feminism = enforced chivalry.
14:00 − 15:00 Society succeeded because women were put first. And we don’t need that dynamic any more. Call to action What’s the worst that would happen if women no more valuable than men, and men no more valuable than women. If we keep following feminism, society will end by unbalancing.
15:00 - end We should celebrate manhood, and feminists don’t want to. Instead, men come in “dead last, every time”
You are correct, in that I misread her call to action. Mostly because I was mindkilled about her definition of feminist. I’m not saying that no one acts how she describes from 11:50 − 14:00, but it’s just not an inherent property of feminist to act and believe that way.
For example, I don’t want to ignore male victim’s of domestic violence, and I doubt most other feminists want to either. I like her call to action, but I think it is a feminist call, and I think her factual assertions from 14:00 to the end (especially “men come in dead last, every time”) are almost entirely false.