Good point, actually. In matters of epistemology, it takes reasoning rather than physical evidence to evaluate hypotheses, except when physical evidence can help people see flaws in their reasoning.
it takes reasoning rather than physical evidence
Your mind exists in the universe. There isn’t a hard barrier between “reasoning” and “physical evidence.”
Good point, actually. In matters of epistemology, it takes reasoning rather than physical evidence to evaluate hypotheses, except when physical evidence can help people see flaws in their reasoning.
Your mind exists in the universe. There isn’t a hard barrier between “reasoning” and “physical evidence.”