There are no fundamental “feelings.” The map of reality exists inside a brain which is a part of reality. Your modal logic and monad tensor algebra is unnecessary and meaningless. Everything you say has simpler explanations. You’re begging the question, you show clear signs of self deception.
The universe is fundamentally simple, only in our map-of-the-universe do we pretend that things are different in order to compress the information.
You are misusing words. Like, basic errors.
And I am not going to take apart your wall-of-text philosophy. Come back when you have equations and predictions. Until then I am a material reductionist.
Halt, melt, catch fire. Now. Unless you Aumann up, this conversation is over.
There are no fundamental “feelings.” The map of reality exists inside a brain which is a part of reality. Your modal logic and monad tensor algebra is unnecessary and meaningless. Everything you say has simpler explanations. You’re begging the question, you show clear signs of self deception.
The universe is fundamentally simple, only in our map-of-the-universe do we pretend that things are different in order to compress the information.
You are misusing words. Like, basic errors.
And I am not going to take apart your wall-of-text philosophy. Come back when you have equations and predictions. Until then I am a material reductionist.
Halt, melt, catch fire. Now. Unless you Aumann up, this conversation is over.
Aumann agreement is a cooperative process. Flying off the handle in the face of persistent disagreement does not look like part of such a process.
For you and Mitchell Porter, that is probably the best achievable outcome.