The browser PDF readers are even worse than standalone Adobe Acrobat (especially in Chrome, which is my primary web browser).
My opinion is the opposite, to the point I’ve set Chrome as my default program for PDFs, even those on my local hard drive. IIRC, it’s based on the open source Foxit reader.
I thought viewing it in my browser is more akin to streaming a video.
The difference is minor. FWIW, a better analogy might be downloading a video file to your browser’s temp directory and then opening it in VLC to watch while it’s still downloading.
Just FYI, when you click a link and view content, that content has been downloaded onto your hard drive, even if you only see it on a browser window..
The browser PDF readers are even worse than standalone Adobe Acrobat (especially in Chrome, which is my primary web browser).
I’d rather just not support the use of such a broken file format.
My opinion is the opposite, to the point I’ve set Chrome as my default program for PDFs, even those on my local hard drive. IIRC, it’s based on the open source Foxit reader.
Chrome’s PDF reader is missing a lot of features. Notably, no page numbers / jump to page.
Really? I thought viewing it in my browser is more akin to streaming a video. But I could easily be wrong about that.
Ah, okay. I use Firefox with an Adobe Acrobat plugin. Not familiar at all with Chrome and other PDF readers.
The difference is minor. FWIW, a better analogy might be downloading a video file to your browser’s temp directory and then opening it in VLC to watch while it’s still downloading.
Gotcha. Thank you for the correction.