Note that Wei Dai also had this idea.
I don’t quite understand sigmaxipi’s idea, but from what I can tell, it’s not the same as mine.
In my proposal, your counter-example isn’t a problem, because something that is less complex (easier to specify) is given a higher utility bound.
because something that is less complex (easier to specify) is given a higher utility bound.
Oh, I see, so your proposal is actually the opposite of sigmaxipi’s. He wants lower complexity to correspond to lower utility.
Note that Wei Dai also had this idea.
I don’t quite understand sigmaxipi’s idea, but from what I can tell, it’s not the same as mine.
In my proposal, your counter-example isn’t a problem, because something that is less complex (easier to specify) is given a higher utility bound.
Oh, I see, so your proposal is actually the opposite of sigmaxipi’s. He wants lower complexity to correspond to lower utility.