I agree with the first part. In the second part, where is the randomness in the information? The set of all N-bit integers is completely predictable for a given N.
So the complexity of the set of all possible continuations of a person has less information content than just the person.
And the complexity of the set of happy or positive utility continuations is determined by the complexity of specifying a boundary. Rather like the complexity of the set of all integers of binary length ⇐ N digits that also satisfy property P is really the same as the complexity of property P.
So the complexity of the set of all possible continuations of a person has less information content than just the person.
When you say “just the person” do you mean just the person at H(T_n) or a specific continuation of the person at H(T_n)? I would say H(T_n) < H(all possible T_n+1) < H(specific T_n+1)
I agree with the first part. In the second part, where is the randomness in the information? The set of all N-bit integers is completely predictable for a given N.
Exactly. So, the same phenomenon occurs when considering the set of all possible continuations of a person. Yes?
For the set of all possible inputs (and thus all possible continuations), yes.
So the complexity of the set of all possible continuations of a person has less information content than just the person.
And the complexity of the set of happy or positive utility continuations is determined by the complexity of specifying a boundary. Rather like the complexity of the set of all integers of binary length ⇐ N digits that also satisfy property P is really the same as the complexity of property P.
When you say “just the person” do you mean just the person at H(T_n) or a specific continuation of the person at H(T_n)? I would say H(T_n) < H(all possible T_n+1) < H(specific T_n+1)
I agree with the second part.