Would anyone actually be interested if I prepared a post about the recent “correlation explanation” approach to latent-model learning, the “multivariate mutual information”/”total correlation” metric it’s all based on, supervenience in analytical philosophy, and implications for cognitive science and AI, including FAI?
Because I promise I didn’t write that last sentence by picking buzzwords out of a bag.
Anyway, could you PM me your email address? I figure that for a start at being Reviewer 2, I might as well send you the last thing I wrote along these lines, and then start writing the one I’ve actually just promised.
I think you are overestimating how literally and seriously Ilya intended his reference to be taken.
I don’t think the intended parallel goes beyond this: the devil (allegedly) tries to do evil and ends up doing good in spite of that; a highly critical reviewer feels (to the reviewee) like he’s doing evil but ends up doing good in spite of that.
Would anyone actually be interested if I prepared a post about the recent “correlation explanation” approach to latent-model learning, the “multivariate mutual information”/”total correlation” metric it’s all based on, supervenience in analytical philosophy, and implications for cognitive science and AI, including FAI?
Because I promise I didn’t write that last sentence by picking buzzwords out of a bag.
I might be super mean about this!
Is “super mean” still a bad thing, or now a good thing?
I will be very interested to read both your account of correlation explanation and Ilya’s super-meanness about it.
In the words of Calvin’s dad, it builds character.
Ah. You mean you’ll act as Reviewer 2. Excellent.
There is a relevant quote from Faust by Mephistopheles.
That being, for those of us too gauche to have read Faust in the original?
Ein Teil von jener Kraft,
Die stets das Böse will und stets das Gute schafft.
Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint!
Part of that power which would
Do evil constantly and constantly does good.
I am the spirit of perpetual negation
Anyway, could you PM me your email address? I figure that for a start at being Reviewer 2, I might as well send you the last thing I wrote along these lines, and then start writing the one I’ve actually just promised.
I really don’t think that Reviewer 2 has anything to do with Lucifer, or with the Catholic view of Lucifer/Satan as self-thwarting.
I think you are overestimating how literally and seriously Ilya intended his reference to be taken.
I don’t think the intended parallel goes beyond this: the devil (allegedly) tries to do evil and ends up doing good in spite of that; a highly critical reviewer feels (to the reviewee) like he’s doing evil but ends up doing good in spite of that.
Ah. But of course the reviewer thinks he’s good, from his point of view within the system.
Oh yes, indeed. (For me that’s actually part of why the parallel Ilya is drawing is funny.)
I’d be interested! I hereby promise to read and comment, unless you’ve gone totally off the bland end.
Ok, then, it’ll definitely happen Real Soon Now.