By in any sense I mean there might be “nothing” as most people would define it rather than as it is defined in quantum physics.
If you accept that the universe exists then the most remarkable think about the universe is that it does exist. So you should only accept that there is almost certainly something if you have an exceptionally large amount of evidence.
Any sense at all? Could you clarify?
By in any sense I mean there might be “nothing” as most people would define it rather than as it is defined in quantum physics.
If you accept that the universe exists then the most remarkable think about the universe is that it does exist. So you should only accept that there is almost certainly something if you have an exceptionally large amount of evidence.
I ditto James_Miller, primarily because the definition of ‘exist’ I worked out can’t apply to the universe as a whole.