But this is really a serious concern. Brushing it away with a comment along the lines of “Well, they also say that about obviously non-cultish figure X; how silly!” is like—like—well, um...
Still, how would we go about determining whether this accusation was true? I think that EY is a smart cookie who writes engagingly on an important topic that doesn’t get enough attention; is that in itself disciple-like behaviour, and if not how should we determine whether that’s enough to account for my behavour, or whether the additional disciple hypothesis is warranted?
But this is really a serious concern. Brushing it away with a comment along the lines of “Well, they also say that about obviously non-cultish figure X; how silly!” is like—like—well, um...
--failing to pump against entropy, as it is written that “Every Cause Wants to Be a Cult.”
Downvoted.
Still, how would we go about determining whether this accusation was true? I think that EY is a smart cookie who writes engagingly on an important topic that doesn’t get enough attention; is that in itself disciple-like behaviour, and if not how should we determine whether that’s enough to account for my behavour, or whether the additional disciple hypothesis is warranted?