That sounds like a lot of social anxiety to me if it’s enshrined as a routine group behaviour—heat & light make me tend to think something interesting is going on that isn’t being directly discussed.
I’m surprised that a group predicated on doing things better would appeal to tradition and authority as a reason for, well, anything.
And—seriously? Argument that “he” is gender-neutral? More argument for an eventual discussion of privilege as a pervasive bias.
The privilege-as-bias discussion has been had a few times, including in the context of gendered pronouns.
Which is no reason not to have it again, I suppose, but I encourage you to think carefully before doing so about your strategy for progressing it further than previous incarnations have, so we don’t keep going ’round the same mulberry bush.
Unrelatedly, tradition isn’t a bad thing to appeal to when it comes to the meaning of words, or really to any activity that depends on a community’s predictable adherence to conventions.
Why do we drive on the right side of the road in the U.S. rather than the left, and stop at red lights and go at green lights rather than vice-versa, and use “hello” to greet people rather than “ahoy” or “shoelace”? Basically, tradition.
Would it be better to switch? Well, maybe. But for at least some of those things, it’s better only if we all switch at once, which is difficult to manage.
That sounds like a lot of social anxiety to me if it’s enshrined as a routine group behaviour—heat & light make me tend to think something interesting is going on that isn’t being directly discussed.
I’m surprised that a group predicated on doing things better would appeal to tradition and authority as a reason for, well, anything.
And—seriously? Argument that “he” is gender-neutral? More argument for an eventual discussion of privilege as a pervasive bias.
Fascinating, thank you for your thoughtful reply.
The privilege-as-bias discussion has been had a few times, including in the context of gendered pronouns.
Which is no reason not to have it again, I suppose, but I encourage you to think carefully before doing so about your strategy for progressing it further than previous incarnations have, so we don’t keep going ’round the same mulberry bush.
Unrelatedly, tradition isn’t a bad thing to appeal to when it comes to the meaning of words, or really to any activity that depends on a community’s predictable adherence to conventions.
Why do we drive on the right side of the road in the U.S. rather than the left, and stop at red lights and go at green lights rather than vice-versa, and use “hello” to greet people rather than “ahoy” or “shoelace”? Basically, tradition.
Would it be better to switch? Well, maybe. But for at least some of those things, it’s better only if we all switch at once, which is difficult to manage.