One of the references within the article there caught my eye. Max Tegmark was a coauthor. It was also the one paper that didn’t have me cringing with some of the language used.
My physics and in particular my cosmology isn’t at the level where I can properly evaluate the likelyhood of the model being correct. That said it has sufficient coherence that it seems at least worth keeping in mind. I’ve wondered for a long time what, if anything, could be underneath those equations.
One of the references within the article there caught my eye. Max Tegmark was a coauthor. It was also the one paper that didn’t have me cringing with some of the language used.
My physics and in particular my cosmology isn’t at the level where I can properly evaluate the likelyhood of the model being correct. That said it has sufficient coherence that it seems at least worth keeping in mind. I’ve wondered for a long time what, if anything, could be underneath those equations.