My original response was a more abstract explaination of why I think describing money as “not real” is misleading but maybe I more direct response to the article would be more useful since I think that part actually isn’t core to your question.
Just to clarify, I’m not the OP. It just seemed to me like you and the OP were saying something similar.
I guess “temporarily motivating strangers” is a reasonable description of what money does. I should have argued against calling that motivation illusory or not-real.
Just to clarify, I’m not the OP. It just seemed to me like you and the OP were saying something similar.
I guess “temporarily motivating strangers” is a reasonable description of what money does. I should have argued against calling that motivation illusory or not-real.