Isn’t most of the evidence that doctors use supposed to be public if laboursome to access?
How come you know the result of the research before doing it? If you don’t have faith and then as result of research agreed with the “majority” or standard view then that would produce the confidence/faith to proceed.
Off course if there is background paranoia that could be skewing the results but then it moves to the question whether that paranoia is warranted or not. As a non-expert is it ever reasonable to fail to follow expert opinion without becoming an expert yourself?
Isn’t most of the evidence that doctors use supposed to be public if laboursome to access?
How come you know the result of the research before doing it? If you don’t have faith and then as result of research agreed with the “majority” or standard view then that would produce the confidence/faith to proceed.
Off course if there is background paranoia that could be skewing the results but then it moves to the question whether that paranoia is warranted or not. As a non-expert is it ever reasonable to fail to follow expert opinion without becoming an expert yourself?