There’s a solution for that. (At least a partial solution. As a long-time AK user I find that I can more and more reliably identify a few commenters by their style. Even so I typically vote on substance alone.)
As a long-time AK user I find that I can more and more reliably identify a few commenters by their style.
Do you often confuse me with Clippy? I would have thought my comments were for most part reasonably distinctive...
Just that once. That comment was, roughly paraphrased, “would you like me if I said X”, which was quite Clippy-esque. Less so when seen in context.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
There’s a solution for that. (At least a partial solution. As a long-time AK user I find that I can more and more reliably identify a few commenters by their style. Even so I typically vote on substance alone.)
Do you often confuse me with Clippy? I would have thought my comments were for most part reasonably distinctive...
Just that once. That comment was, roughly paraphrased, “would you like me if I said X”, which was quite Clippy-esque. Less so when seen in context.