Right, assuming he doesn’t care about the fact that hundreds of his peers now think he’s the kind of person who bursts into loud, inappropriate laughter apropos of nothing. (i.e. assuming he isn’t human.)
Ignoring that that is not what happened (and that he probably explained the laughter to anyone there that he actually cared about, like friends), you are entirely too eager to designate someone who lacks this property as ‘not human’.
Ignoring that that is not what happened (and that he probably explained the laughter to anyone there that he actually cared about, like friends), you are entirely too eager to designate someone who lacks this property as ‘not human’.