Z M Davis—my point is that there are versions of non-reductionism or weak reductionism that do not depend on or imply supernatural forces. That’s the sort I’m interested in, anyway. The zombie argument is a paradigm of how not to explore the conceptual space between strict reductionism and outright religious dualism.
I’ll say again that the zombie argument is inane...and the fact that people who expound it have fame and tenure indicates that the quarks are cruel, arbitrary, and capricious.
Z M Davis—my point is that there are versions of non-reductionism or weak reductionism that do not depend on or imply supernatural forces. That’s the sort I’m interested in, anyway. The zombie argument is a paradigm of how not to explore the conceptual space between strict reductionism and outright religious dualism.
I’ll say again that the zombie argument is inane...and the fact that people who expound it have fame and tenure indicates that the quarks are cruel, arbitrary, and capricious.