What exactly is the logical flaw you’ve found? The zombie argument tells among other things that there can be no test that will tell if a person is really conscious or just a zombie. You might “know” that you’re conscious yourself, but there can be no rational argument that proves this.
“What real reasons? I don’t see any.”
If Zombie Worlds are possible, we might be living in it and therefore there can be no argument that proves otherwise. Your brain assumes that you have qualia, but I make no such assumption.
That is exactly what I was thinking. If it is indifferentiable, then how do we know that we aren’t ‘zombies’ ? It’s like the antimatter problem. We can’t prove A or B, so we assume A, which we have always preferred.
“We’ve already found the flaw.”
What exactly is the logical flaw you’ve found? The zombie argument tells among other things that there can be no test that will tell if a person is really conscious or just a zombie. You might “know” that you’re conscious yourself, but there can be no rational argument that proves this.
“What real reasons? I don’t see any.” If Zombie Worlds are possible, we might be living in it and therefore there can be no argument that proves otherwise. Your brain assumes that you have qualia, but I make no such assumption.
I believe you just found the flaw.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck.
That is exactly what I was thinking. If it is indifferentiable, then how do we know that we aren’t ‘zombies’ ? It’s like the antimatter problem. We can’t prove A or B, so we assume A, which we have always preferred.
is indifferentiable a word?