I’m… confused? I thought the part I had reacted to was this:
I think there has also been a trend towards the longest-hours-worked being for wealthier people rather than poorer people.
Which seems like a well-operationalized factual claim that I looked up sources for (and then linked in my 2 other comments here). I’m not sure what this has to do with paraphrasing someone’s position; are you saying that react should be used only for paraphrasing others, or what? Or that my sources were inadequate (which is a somewhat reasonable criticism, FWIW)?
Perhaps you thought this was a react to the entire comment, as opposed to an inline react? I’m not sure why it showed up that way, but you can see in the text above the names of those who reacted and anti-reacted that the react was only to that part of aphyer’s comment.
Darn it, I misread the UI. When I hover over the react, it only shows me the bold section of the following quote as being reacted-to:
I would phrase what you are looking for as a world where society has nothing to offer people that is nice enough they are willing to work an unpleasant job to produce it.
It turns out that’s actually the text referred to by the other react (the “misunderstands position” react, which makes sense in context). I don’t know why the relevant section (“I think there has also been a trend...”) isn’t highlighted when I hover over your react.
Anyway, I retract the above, my apologies for the mistake!
I’m… confused? I thought the part I had reacted to was this:
Which seems like a well-operationalized factual claim that I looked up sources for (and then linked in my 2 other comments here). I’m not sure what this has to do with paraphrasing someone’s position; are you saying that react should be used only for paraphrasing others, or what? Or that my sources were inadequate (which is a somewhat reasonable criticism, FWIW)?
Perhaps you thought this was a react to the entire comment, as opposed to an inline react? I’m not sure why it showed up that way, but you can see in the text above the names of those who reacted and anti-reacted that the react was only to that part of aphyer’s comment.
Darn it, I misread the UI. When I hover over the react, it only shows me the bold section of the following quote as being reacted-to:
It turns out that’s actually the text referred to by the other react (the “misunderstands position” react, which makes sense in context). I don’t know why the relevant section (“I think there has also been a trend...”) isn’t highlighted when I hover over your react.
Anyway, I retract the above, my apologies for the mistake!
Here, you can go hunt down the people who used the react that way on this comment instead.