Thank you! I haven’t read Armstrongs’ work in detail on my side, but I think that one key difference is that classical indifference methods all try to make the agent “act as if the button could not be pressed” which causes the big gamble problem.
By the way, do you have any idea why almost all link on the page you linked are dead or how to find the mentioned articles ??
I haven’t read your post in detail. But ‘effective disbelief’ sounds similar to Stuart Armstrongs work on indifference methods.
Thank you! I haven’t read Armstrongs’ work in detail on my side, but I think that one key difference is that classical indifference methods all try to make the agent “act as if the button could not be pressed” which causes the big gamble problem.
By the way, do you have any idea why almost all link on the page you linked are dead or how to find the mentioned articles ??
You mean my link to arXiv? The PDF there should be readable. Or do you mean the articles linked in the PDF? They seem to work as well just fine.
Thank you, Idk why but before I ended up on a different page with broken links (maybe some problem on my part)!