Is the author even aware that Heidegger lived in a hut in the woods most of his life?
Who is this relevant?
if you think postmodernism can be described as “decidedly left wing”, you’re clearly unfamiliar with the rather nuanced stances of many of its proponents.
Do you actual think this kind of blatant lie is going to fool anyone? Or have you adopted the post-moderists’ selective attitude towards objective reality?
The neo-reactionary movement and the “dark enlightenment” seem very much in the post-modernist context yet not decidedly left wing. They disagree on values with most people who adopt post-modernist thinking, sure, but they utilize the same general stances towards epistemology, identity, and society as post-modernists, especially the structuralists.
Who is this relevant?
Do you actual think this kind of blatant lie is going to fool anyone? Or have you adopted the post-moderists’ selective attitude towards objective reality?
Is it?
The neo-reactionary movement and the “dark enlightenment” seem very much in the post-modernist context yet not decidedly left wing. They disagree on values with most people who adopt post-modernist thinking, sure, but they utilize the same general stances towards epistemology, identity, and society as post-modernists, especially the structuralists.