And that’s also my answer to Moore’s Open Question. Why is this big function I’m talking about, right? Because when I say “that big function”, and you say “right”, we are dereferencing two different pointers to the same unverbalizable abstract computation
If the big function is defined as the function that tells you what is really right, then it’s telling you what is really right… tautologously.
But the same would be true of the omniscient god, Form of the Good etc.
Talking in terms of algorithms or functions isn’t doing much lifting. The big function is no more physically real than the omniscient god, Form of the Good etc.
If the big function is defined as the function that tells you what is really right, then it’s telling you what is really right… tautologously.
But the same would be true of the omniscient god, Form of the Good etc.
Talking in terms of algorithms or functions isn’t doing much lifting. The big function is no more physically real than the omniscient god, Form of the Good etc.