While not wishing to contradict Raemon’s comment in any way, I do want to say that the question of which factual claims in the Sequences hold up, and which do not, is an interesting one, separately from the matter of whether any one of those claims is particularly critical to the post in which it appears.
FiveMuru (or anyone else), if this is a subject that interests you, I’d love to hear more about which of Eliezer’s claims about the Bible, etc., you think are inaccurate. Over at readthesequences.com, you’ll find that each of the essays of the Sequences has a Talk page (here’s the talk page for “Religion’s Claim to be Non-Disprovable”, for instance); you’re welcome to post your comments on this subject there!
While not wishing to contradict Raemon’s comment in any way, I do want to say that the question of which factual claims in the Sequences hold up, and which do not, is an interesting one, separately from the matter of whether any one of those claims is particularly critical to the post in which it appears.
FiveMuru (or anyone else), if this is a subject that interests you, I’d love to hear more about which of Eliezer’s claims about the Bible, etc., you think are inaccurate. Over at readthesequences.com, you’ll find that each of the essays of the Sequences has a Talk page (here’s the talk page for “Religion’s Claim to be Non-Disprovable”, for instance); you’re welcome to post your comments on this subject there!