As an aside, I think it is equivocation to talk about this kind of probability as being the same kind of probability that quantum mechanics leads to. No, hidden variable theories are not really worth considering.
But projectivism has been written about for quite a long time (since at least the 1700s), and is very well known so I find it hard to believe that there are any significant proponents of ‘frequentism’ (as you call it).
To those who’ve not thought about it, everyday projectivism comes naturally, but it falls apart at the slightest consideration.
When it comes to Hempel’s raven, though, even those who understand projectivism can have difficulty coming to terms with the probabilistic reality.
As an aside, I think it is equivocation to talk about this kind of probability as being the same kind of probability that quantum mechanics leads to. No, hidden variable theories are not really worth considering.
But projectivism has been written about for quite a long time (since at least the 1700s), and is very well known so I find it hard to believe that there are any significant proponents of ‘frequentism’ (as you call it).
To those who’ve not thought about it, everyday projectivism comes naturally, but it falls apart at the slightest consideration.
When it comes to Hempel’s raven, though, even those who understand projectivism can have difficulty coming to terms with the probabilistic reality.