Perhaps the difference between the Inquisition and Feynman is that science specifically claims it has nothing to say about morality, so it can’t justify killing anyone in its name.
Science has much to say about morality. It can say which morals different groups of people have, what are probable causes for morals, and which morals are useful on an gene|individual|group|society|planet level.
Perhaps the difference between the Inquisition and Feynman is that science specifically claims it has nothing to say about morality, so it can’t justify killing anyone in its name.
Science has much to say about morality. It can say which morals different groups of people have, what are probable causes for morals, and which morals are useful on an gene|individual|group|society|planet level.
That’s not science, that’s story-telling.
That’s not science, that’s preaching.
On your view, does science have anything to say about the probable causes for gastric enzymes, eyeballs, or toenails?