Four kinds of actors/processes/decisions are directly very important to AI governance:
Corporate self-governance
Adopting safety standards
Proving a model for government regulation
US policy (and China, EU, UK, and others to a lesser extent)
Regulation
Incorporating standards into law
Standard-setters setting standards
International relations
Treaties
Informal influence on safety standards
Related: How technical safety standards could promote TAI safety.
(“Safety standards” sounds prosaic but it doesn’t have to be.)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Four kinds of actors/processes/decisions are directly very important to AI governance:
Corporate self-governance
Adopting safety standards
Proving a model for government regulation
US policy (and China, EU, UK, and others to a lesser extent)
Regulation
Incorporating standards into law
Standard-setters setting standards
International relations
Treaties
Informal influence on safety standards
Related: How technical safety standards could promote TAI safety.
(“Safety standards” sounds prosaic but it doesn’t have to be.)