This is a long post, unnecessarily broken up by illustrations, that takes a long time to get to anything resembling a point. It also seems to be written with the purpose of shilling some sort of startup or product.
Now, I don’t necessarily have anything against any of these things, but… they do dramatically lower my estimate of the likelihood that reading the post will be a good use of my time.
With that in mind: is there any chance we could get some sort of “executive summary”? OP, I get the sense that you’re trying to convey that this is something important or valuable—so, would you consider writing a few sentences about what the heck this post is about?
The Lanby is building a primary care utopia no one else thought of, even though it’s obvious, with focus on prevention, quality care and free unicorns.
Now, this may be a stupid question, but I can’t seem to find the answer on a skim or Cmd-F of the post: why is this… thing… called “the Lanby”? What is a… lanby?
This is a long post, unnecessarily broken up by illustrations, that takes a long time to get to anything resembling a point. It also seems to be written with the purpose of shilling some sort of startup or product.
Now, I don’t necessarily have anything against any of these things, but… they do dramatically lower my estimate of the likelihood that reading the post will be a good use of my time.
With that in mind: is there any chance we could get some sort of “executive summary”? OP, I get the sense that you’re trying to convey that this is something important or valuable—so, would you consider writing a few sentences about what the heck this post is about?
Uncharitable summary:
The Lanby is building a primary care utopia no one else thought of, even though it’s obvious, with focus on prevention, quality care and free unicorns.
Hmm.
Now, this may be a stupid question, but I can’t seem to find the answer on a skim or Cmd-F of the post: why is this… thing… called “the Lanby”? What is a… lanby?